If an injured worker in Nevada successfully convinces a hearing officer to reverse an adjuster’s action on a claim, the insurer and/or the employer has the right to file an appeal to an appeals officer. The insurer or employer must file their appeal within 30 days (plus 3 days for mailing of the hearing officer’s decision). The insurer or employer usually wait until the last possible day to file an appeal. Whether the insurer has to comply and do what the hearing officer ordered depends on whether the insurer is able to obtain an order from an appeals officer staying the decision of the hearing officer until the next appeal is decided by the appeals officer.
 A Motion for Stay is the legal document that the insurer or employer files  with the appeals office asking the appeals officer to order that the insurer  does not have to do what the hearing officer ordered.  The insurer or employer  who files an appeal of a hearing officer’s decision almost always files a Motion  for Stay when they file an appeal from a hearing officer’s decision.  The  insurer usually argues in a Motion for Stay that because the law does not allow an  insurer to recover any benefits it must pay before its appeal is decided by the appeals officer, the decision of the hearing officer should be stayed.
The injured worker should always file an opposition to a Motion for Stay.   Otherwise,  the appeals officer is likely to grant a stay order.  If the  injured worker does not already have an attorney, he should immediately request  that a NAIW attorney be appointed to oppose the Motion for Stay and to represent  the claimant at the upcoming hearing before the appeals officer.   
If the insurer files an appeal and a Motion for Stay, the insurer does not  have to comply with the hearing officer’s decision until 10 days after the  appeals officer rules on the motion.  At this point,  over 45 days will have  elapsed since the hearing officer ruled favorably for the injured worker.  If  the motion is granted, and a stay order is signed by the appeals officer  assigned the case, the insurer will not have to do what the hearing officer  ordered.  
To further complicate things, even if the appeals officer denies a Motion  for Stay, the insurer still may not have to do what the hewing officer ordered  until after the appeals officer decides the case.  There is  a law that allows the insurer an automatic stay as to payment of large sums of  money that are contested. See NRS 616C.380.  For example, if the hearing  officer orders that the insurer should not have suspended the claimant’s  benefits, and over 3 months of retroactive benefits are due as a result of the  favorable decision, the insurer will not have to pay those retroactive benefits  all at once.  Instead, the insurer only has to pay one month of benefits each  month until the case is decided by the appeals officer or until all of the  retroactive benefits have been paid over several months.    Another example is  that the insurer does not have to pay a lump sum of a PPD award that is ordered by a hearing officer if the appeals officer denies the insurer’s request for a stay order.  The insurer can instead pay installment benefits on the  PPD until the appeals officer decides what percentage PPD should be awarded.  
                  






